PLUS SIZE BLOGGER BUTTON

Total Pageviews

MUSIC PLAYER


Get a playlist! Standalone player Get Ringtones
Showing posts with label WEIGHT LOSS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WEIGHT LOSS. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

ARTICLE - MORE WEIGHT LOSS SEEN WITH GASTRIC BYPASS THAN BANDING

More weight loss seen with gastric bypass than banding



A gastric bypass operation called Roux-en-Y involves reducing stomach size with staples and connecting the smaller "pouch" directly to the small intestine. It is irreversible.
Gastric banding, as its name implies, involves placing a band around part of the stomach to reduce its size. This procedure is reversible, the researchers noted.
"Both gastric banding and gastric bypass are currently performed for morbid obesity," said lead researcher Dr. Michel Suter, chief surgeon at Chablais Hospital in Aigle.
"Bypass is more effective in terms of directs results such as weight loss, but a bit more dangerous immediately than banding," he said.
However, banding often leads to long-term complications requiring some sort of major re-operation, Suter said.
"In addition, many bands are not going to stay in place for much more than 10 years; hence, banding is unlikely to be the only weight-loss procedure the patient will be submitted to," he said. "Patients should make a choice knowing this, and decide whether they accept a slightly higher early risk to improve their results, or if they want the least invasive procedure, but then accept a high risk of further surgery at a later time."
The report was published in the Jan. 16 online edition of the Archives of Surgery.
For the study, Suter's team followed for six years 442 patients who had either gastric bypass surgery or banding.
Although there were more early surgical complications among those who had Roux-en-Y surgery, these patients lost more weight faster than those who had gastric banding, the researchers found.
After bypass surgery, about 17 percent of the patients had complications, compared with more than 5 percent of those who underwent banding, the researchers noted.
But at six years there were more problems with gastric banding, including about 48 percent who had weight gain or the procedure reversed, compared with about 12 percent who had bypass surgery, the study found.
Gastric banding was associated with more long-term complications (more than 42 percent versus 19 percent) and more new procedures than bypass surgery (about 27 percent vs. 13 percent).
Cholesterol levels among those who had gastric bypass surgery were consistently lower than among those who had gastric banding, who saw no change over time, the researchers add.
This finding implies that blood sugar levels were also lower among those who underwent gastric bypass surgery, the study authors said.
Suter is concerned that many patients are only offered banding and not told of its drawbacks.
"There is, in the United States, an extensive campaign promoting gastric banding as 'the solution' for obesity, which is far from being true," he said.
It can result in significant weight loss, but it remains a surgical procedure, and is certainly associated with significant risks, both in the short and long term, Suter said.
"Patients must be informed that surgery alone is not sufficient to achieve significant weight loss, and they must be instructed about other things they have to do such as changing their eating and lifestyle habits," he said.
In addition, Suter said, "Patients calling or referred for gastric banding must be informed about the other available procedures for morbid obesity, and not offered band only, as is the case in several places."
Depending on the actual operation, either procedure costs between $10,000 and $20,000 plus follow-up costs, and insurance coverage is very inconsistent, according to Dr. Edward Livingston, who serves as the Dr. Lee Hudson-Robert R. Penn Chair in Surgery at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, in Dallas.
Hospital stay for bypass is usually two days, and banding usually one day, but this can vary depending on surgeon, hospital and complications.
Dr. Jacques Himpens, from the European School of Laparoscopic Surgery at Saint Pierre University Hospital in Brussels and author of an accompanying journal editorial, is less concerned with a particular procedure than with the specific surgeon.
"Not all surgeons can do bypasses," he said. "Maybe they don't have the skills or the experience, but in any case it's not the best option because they are not up to it," he said. "That's the case for many surgeons."
In addition, it is not clear what the long-term results of a bypass are, because there is evidence that although a bypass "cures" diabetes, it does come back after time, Himpens said.
"The bypass is a very good procedure, but not everyone can do it and we have to be very careful and watch what the long-term effects of the procedure are," he said.
Also, while a gastric bypass causes changes in metabolism, banding does not, Himpens said.
"But the good thing is that it is reversible. When you take out the band, no harm has been done and you can still do another procedure if you need to," he said.
However, among patients who receive bands, only 40 percent retain them after 10 years, either because of complications or the desire to have it removed, Himpens said.
On the Web:
www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/007199.htm, the U.S. National Library of Medicine has more on gastric bypass procedures.

Sunday, January 8, 2012

ARTICLE - WEIGHT LOSS SABOTAGED BY WRONG CALORIE COUNTS ON MENUS

Weight Loss Sabotaged By Wrong Calorie Counts on Menus




Weight loss can be hard if you don’t know how many calories you take in. A new study suggests that some restaurants offer deceptive menu information.
 
Research has shown that people make smarter choices when restaurants list the calorie counts on their menu. But what happens if the numbers aren’t accurate?
Researchers at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University  found that roughly 50 percent of the food you get at places such as Wendy’s, Applebee’s, Olive Garden, Denny’s, Dunkin’ Donuts, P F Chang’s, Domino’s, McDonald’s and Taco Bell is more fattening than those places say they are. In the worst cases, some foods had twice the calories stated on the menu. The average dish had 18 percent more calories than advertised.

The same study also took a look at some frozen foods from Weight Watchers and Lean Cuisine – foods that are supposed to be the dieter’s choice. A close examination revealed that some of their offerings contained 8 percent more calories than what was listed.

 The study’s lead author, Susan Roberts, said this amount of extra calories may not seem like much. But for those watching fat, calories and salt, the difference can add up fast for people expecting to lose a few pounds in a certain timeframe.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

ARTICLE - CUTTING CARBS JUST 2 DAYS A WEEK CAN SPUR WEIGHT LOSS

Cutting carbs just 2 days a week can spur weight loss

 

By
msnbc.com contributor
updated 12/8/2011 
 
Dieters who can’t stomach the idea of going hungry seven days a week just got good news: You might be able to drop more weight if you cut back on carbs just two days a week.
British researchers found that women who essentially gave up carbs for two days and ate normally the rest of the time dropped about 9 pounds on average, as compared to the 5 pounds lost by women who cut back to around 1,500 calories every day, according to a report presented at the CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
“We came up with the idea of an intermittent low-carb diet because it enables people to still have foods that are very satiating,” said the study’s lead author Michelle Harvie, a research dietician at the Genesis Prevention Center at the University Hospital in South Manchester, England. “Also, there’s a lot of evidence from other studies showing that restricting carbohydrates has the same effect as restricting energy.”
Harvie and her colleagues were spurred to find a diet that would be easier for women to follow because research has shown that obesity and the changes it causes in the body increase the risk for breast cancer. “We know from our research in animal models that losing weight has the potential for reducing breast cancer risk,” Harvie said.


The researchers followed 88 women for four months. All the women were at high risk for breast cancer based on their family histories.
One third of the women were put on a Mediterranean-type diet that restricted calories to about 1,500 per day. A second group was told to eat normally most of the time, but two days a week to cut carbs and also calories to about 650 on those two days. The third group was also to cut carbs two days a week, but there was no calorie restriction on those days.
At the end of four weeks women in both of the intermittent dieting groups had lost more weight — about 9 pounds — than the women who ate low calorie meals every day of the week — about 5 pounds.
Women in the intermittent dieting groups also had better improvement than daily dieters in the levels of hormones — insulin and leptin — that have been linked with breast cancer risk, Harvie said.
And, yes, this is something you can try at home, Harvie said. You just need to dramatically cut back carbohydrates two days a week and try to eat sensibly the rest of the time, she added.
What that means, Harvie said, is that you can eat protein and healthy fats on the two low carb days, but skip bread, pasta, root vegetables like potatoes, carrots and parsnips to get to the 50g limit. The diet allows for one piece of fruit on the low carb days. Other foods on the menu include: nuts and green, leafy vegetables, peppers, mushrooms, tomatoes, broccoli, eggplant and cauliflower.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

NEWS - FDA SAYS HCG WEIGHT LOSS PRODUCTS ARE ILLEGAL



FDA says HCG weight-loss products are illegal

Over-the-counter HCG products being sold for weight loss are illegal and claims that the drugs work are unsubstantiated, the Food and Drug Administration warned consumers Tuesday.
HGC products are sold online and in stores as pellets, sprays or oral drops. These products are considered by the FDA to be unapproved new drugs.
Last week, the FDA, along with the Federal Trade Commission sent warning letters to seven companies manufacturing human chorionic gonadotropin, or HCG, products labeled "homeopathic." The products in question are "hCG Diet Drops Weight Loss Formula," "hCG Diet Pellets Weight Loss Formula," "Alcohol Free hCG Weight Loss Formula,""HCG Fusion 30," "HCG Fusion 43," "Homeopathic Original HCG," Homeopathic HCG," "HCG Platinum X-30," "HCG Platinum X-14" "HCG Diet Homeopathic Drops," and "HCG Extra Weight Loss Homeopathic Drops."

According to the labels, these products should be taken with a "very low calorie diet." This is a very dangerous way to use the HCG supplement, according to the FDA.
“These HCG products marketed over-the-counter are unproven to help with weight loss and are potentially dangerous even if taken as directed,” said Ilisa Bernstein, acting director of the Office of Compliance in FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “And a very low-calorie diet should only be used under proper medical supervision.”
The FDA says people on such diets have an increased risk of heart arrhythmia's, electrolyte imbalance and gallstones. Currently no HCG products for weight loss have been approved by the agency.
Companies have 15 days to tell the agency what corrective actions they will take, otherwise the FDA will take legal action ranging from seizure to criminal prosecution.
“Deceptive advertising about weight loss products is one of the most prevalent types of fraud,” said David Vladeck, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “Any advertiser who makes health claims about a product is required by federal law to back them up with competent and reliable scientific evidence, so consumers have the accurate information they need to make good decisions.”

Friday, October 28, 2011

KICKED OUT OF 'WEIGHT LOSS ADVENTURES' FACEBOOK GROUP

just to prove i can see the group in my other ID i took a screen capture of the header for the group.
 yup, happened last night.

i was posting recipes, stopped to work through some emails, went back to post a recipe for a chili that was pretty good sounding as well as nutritonally sound for any bariatric paitient.
and, couldnt  access the group.

which was weird, because i was just in it.
at first i thought it was a FB error, maybe they were updating servers or something.
so i didint let it bother me to much.
went to sleep on it.

woke up today, tried again, and still couldnt get in.

so it came to me to try under another ID i have in FaceBook...
and what do ya know...i could see the group.
THAT told me tons right there.
i could also, scroll through the members list to see if i was in there...to which i saw i wasnt.

by this time...i had already emailed one of the main admins 2 times waiting for a reply. without response, so i went to the other admin...asked her. she said shed ask for me.

the main admin got back with me on the issue.

told me i was kicked from the group for the way i spoke to other members.

im sorry, i didnt realize i had spoke to any of them in such a way to offend them.
unless, they dont like honesty and its brutal format.

to which, as adults, id think most of us have to deal with...
i guess to many people have been coddled and babied and had stuff sugar coated to them.

my main gripe in the group was that people would come in and say stuff to allow themselves to keep doing certain traits or behaviors, and make excuses for certain things. and another main grip of mine was that people assumed to tell others how to do this whole weight loss surgery.

dont know if many people can tell or not, but allot of drs have different views, they have different techniques, and expect different results.

were not all the same, and if the same dr does my surgery a year ago, then yours today, whos to say data hasnt changed just that fast? it happens.
20 years agos data has changed.

anyway, some people just didnt like what i had to say, and went to the admin and talked to her about it to which she took it upon herself to kick me out.
which is fine. i have no issues with that. if thats how she wants to run her group. its hers.

the issue i have with her is the way she delt with it.

when she got back with me she explained that several people didnt like the way i spoke to them..ok, i can change that,,,
and she felt she didnt need to ask me to leave..
true...but as a respect thing..i feel it would have been better to have been asked or at least told that i was on a warning, and told what i did that was wrong.

one mistake (reminds me of someone else who holds one mistake over me) and i was kicked out, and i still dont know EXACTLY *WHAT* it was i did.

she felt it was childish of me to go ask another member if there was any chatter about me...
heck, i had no clue why i wasnt in there, if i had heard that people were saying something, anything, id maybe have a better understanding of WHY i was kicked.

but it is what it is.

and thats that,
didnt need that group anyway.

have a nice life WEIGHT LOSS ADVENTURES.

MICHELLE

UPDATE:
the OTHER MICHELLE also got kicked out...!!!
she came to me to talk about it, i had to be honest and tell her i thought  they kicked her because her names similar to mine...
the admin i went to 2 times to try to get an answer im pretty sure thought the reference i made to seeing the group under another name, thought the other name was hers (michelles). well, it isnt.
had to send the admin a note telling her i felt they kicked her out based on me, which i felt was wrong.
and they should reconsider allowing her back in, as she ISNT me...

the other Michelle, thinks its hilarious that a group is run this way, and said shed not go back anyway. LOL
YOU GO MICHELLE! lol